Multi-host invites
Everyone on your side gets the same invite.
The event, the video link and the email reach every host on the call. Hosts come with the plan, not by the seat.
How it works
The booker fills in your form, your rules decide whether they get a time, and the booking lands on one invite with a score. All you do is read the result.
You choose what decides whether the call is worth having. No calendar until it is answered.
Clear it and real free time appears. Miss it and they get a polite no, immediately.
Everyone on your side lands on the same event, with the number and a short reason attached.
The operator's view
Each booking with its score and the reasons for it, and a count of everyone your rules turned away. It is all on one screen, so you never piece it together from emails and your calendar.
The best booking on your calendar. $75K+/mo, three of your strongest channels, sole decision maker, immediate start, and an expansion mandate rather than a fix-it mandate, which is where retainers get large. Prepare a market-localisation angle.
The product
Multi-host invites
The event, the video link and the email reach every host on the call. Hosts come with the plan, not by the seat.
Qualification gate
Your questions come before the calendar. Anyone who misses your rule gets your message instead of a time slot.
Setupp Score
Every booking arrives scored from 0 to 10 against what you care about, with the reason in plain words.
Native embed
Two lines of code and the booking form sits in your page, in your fonts and colours. No iframe.
Questions
Setupp is a meeting scheduler that qualifies people before they book. A booker answers your questions first, and from the Pro plan anyone who misses your rules is turned away before a single time slot appears. Every booking that gets through arrives with a score from 0 to 10 and the reasons for it, and every host on your side joins one calendar invite. It is priced per workspace, never per user: Free covers 1 host, and Pro is $19 a month with 3 hosts included.
Yes, and it's a fair comparison to make. The fundamentals (availability, buffers, time zones, writing the event to a calendar) are table stakes and we treat them that way. The differences are structural. Setupp bills per workspace instead of per host. It puts an intake form in front of the calendar and can decline a booker before any availability is rendered. It rates every booking that passes from 0.0 to 10.0 with written reasoning. And the embed inherits your site's design tokens rather than accepting a colour through a query string.
Google Calendar and Outlook Calendar are both live: real free/busy for every host, and one event with all of them on it. The meeting link can be Google Meet or Microsoft Teams, and the booker and every host get the same one. Zoom is built and tested, and turns on for every workspace the day Zoom approves Setupp's app. Apple Calendar over CalDAV is written and in testing, and it is called live only once it has run against a real iCloud account. The integrations page shows where each one stands.
Connect a calendar, add the questions you already ask on every call, and set your minimum. It takes about twenty minutes, and it saves the half hours you spend finding out a call was never going to work.
Free for one host, for as long as you like. You don’t need a card or a sales call to start.
Can we count this visit?
We use Google Analytics to see which pages people find useful. Say no and we still get an anonymous count with no cookie and nothing that follows you. The site works identically either way. No advertising cookies are set on this site in either case.