Chili Piper alternative
Qualify the inbound. Route it simply.
Two different jobs get bundled together under inbound scheduling, and it is worth separating them before comparing anything. One is deciding whether a meeting should happen at all. The other is deciding whose meeting it is.
Setupp does the first properly and the second simply. Rules you write decide whether the calendar appears; round robin and collective assignment decide who is on the invite. There is no rules engine that reads an account record and picks an owner, and if that is the requirement this is not the tool.
The question underneath the search: Can I qualify inbound meetings without an enterprise contract, and what do I give up?
Quote anybody else’s prices or features. Those change, comparison pages do not get re-read, and a table that is wrong by one tier is worse than no table. Every number below is either published Setupp pricing or a figure you type in yourself.
Setupp is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by Chili Piper, Inc.. Chili Piper is their trademark, used here to name the thing you are comparing against.
Hosts, not everyone with a login. Up to 50.
Off your invoice, not off a pricing page.
- What you pay now6 × $12 a month
- $72
- Setupp Teamflat, up to 10 hosts
- $49
$276
$23 a month less, 32% cheaper, and the next 4 hosts cost nothing at all.
What is actually different
Three differences, and only one of them is the price.
Each of these is a fact about this product rather than a claim about another one, which is why each of them carries the tier it is on.
The slot is offered after the answers, not before.
Scoring on every plan including Free. Turning somebody away starts at Pro, $19 a month.A scheduling link is an open door. Anybody who finds it takes a slot, and the first time you learn whether they were worth an hour is when you are already in the hour.
Setupp puts the intake questions first and reads the answers before the calendar appears. If they fail the rules you wrote, they never see a time. If they pass, the booking is confirmed with a 0 to 10 score and the reasoning attached, so you walk in knowing which of the four meetings on Thursday matters.
The rules are yours and they are ordinary conditions on the fields you already ask about: company size, budget, whether they have a system in place today.
A second host is a setting, not a purchase order.
3, 10 and 50 hosts by tier. Round robin assignment from Team.Put a solutions engineer on the discovery call and, under per-seat pricing, that is another subscription every month whether or not they take a booking that week.
Here the plan includes hosts the way it includes calendar connections. Pro covers three, Team ten, Business fifty. You add one in settings and the invoice does not notice until you cross the number on your plan.
One invite goes out with every host on it, availability is intersected across all of their calendars, and the reschedule updates the same event rather than sending a second one.
The price steps twice and then stops.
Free, $19, $49 and $129 a month, per workspace.Per-seat pricing has one property that matters more than the rate: the bill is a function of headcount, so it grows every time the team does, and the growth is automatic.
A flat workspace price is a different shape. It is worse at the bottom, because a floor is a floor, and better everywhere above the crossover. The calculator further up finds yours.
Nothing is metered per booking at any tier, so a good month costs the same as a quiet one.
When not to move
Eight reasons to stay where you are.
Written by the people who would rather you did not sign up than sign up and leave in six weeks.
Routing is the requirement: by territory, by account owner looked up in a CRM, by round-robin weighting, by named-account list. Setupp has round robin and collective assignment and nothing that reads a CRM record to pick an owner. That is a real gap and no part of this page pretends otherwise.
You need a form on your marketing site to hand off into a calendar in the same session with enrichment in between. The intake form here is Setupp's own, and it runs on the booking page rather than in your form builder.
You want speed-to-lead measured and alerted on. Setupp records what it declined and scores what it accepted; it does not time your response.
You are one person with one calendar and a rate under the crossover the calculator found. A floor is a floor, and this one would cost you money.
Your booking links are printed on something. Business cards, an email signature template rolled out to two hundred people, a QR code on a banner. Setupp cannot forward somebody else's URL, so those links go dead when you close the account rather than redirecting.
You need a scheduler on iCloud today. Apple Calendar is written and tested against a stubbed server, and the integrations page marks it in development because it has never spoken to a real iCloud account. Google and Outlook are live.
Routing by territory, by round-robin weighting, by lead owner lookup in a CRM. There is round robin and there is collective assignment. There is not a rules engine that reads an account record and picks an owner.
You want everything in one place through a single automation platform. Outbound webhooks are on Business. A published Zapier app is not built yet, and the integrations page marks it planned rather than coming soon.
Before the arithmetic
You are qualifying already, and paying for routing you may not use
The first thing worth doing is separating the two jobs, because a contract usually covers both and a team usually needs one. Deciding whether a meeting should happen at all is qualification. Deciding whose meeting it is, from a territory or an account owner or a named-account list, is routing. Setupp does the first properly and the second simply, and if the routing is the reason you are on an enterprise contract then this comparison ends here rather than three sections down.
If it is the qualification, what moves across is the ruleset rather than the plumbing. The questions run on Setupp's own booking page or inside the embed on yours, the rules are evaluated server-side on both the availability check and the booking itself, and a booker who does not clear them never sees a calendar. What they see instead is the copy you wrote, which is the part most worth spending an hour on: a decline that reads like a form error costs you the referral, and one that reads like a person costs you nothing.
The gap to plan around is the handoff. Setupp does not read an account record to pick an owner, does not measure speed to lead, and does not accept a submission from your existing form builder and continue from there. What it has instead is assignment that is either collective, where every host is on the invite and availability is intersected across all their calendars, or round robin, balanced across the team. For a team that books its own inbound rather than distributing it by territory, that is usually the whole requirement. For one that does not, it is a real gap and worth saying out loud before anybody signs anything.
If you do move
Five steps, a fortnight, and nothing switched off early.
There is no importer and this page is not going to imply there is one. What there is instead is a way to run both at once until you are sure.
- Step 1
Connect the calendar
Google or Outlook, in about thirty seconds. Existing events become busy time immediately, so nothing double-books while both tools are running.
- Step 2
Rebuild one event type
By hand. There is no importer, and for one event type there does not need to be: duration, buffers, notice, availability windows. Ten minutes, and Free covers exactly one.
- Step 3
Write the questions and the rules
The part that has no equivalent to migrate, because it is the reason for moving. Start with the two questions you always end up asking on the call anyway.
- Step 4
Run both for a fortnight
Keep the old link live and put the new one on one surface. On Free the score is advisory: it never turns anybody away, so you can see what it would have said before you let it act.
- Step 5
Move the link
When the scores are matching your read on the calls, swap the link everywhere and let the old tool lapse at renewal. Never mid-cycle: you have already paid for it.
Qualify leads before they book, not after
What you get, by tier
The tier every claim on this page sits on.
Read out of the entitlements table the product enforces, not retyped from the pricing page, so this cannot promise something the code refuses to do.
| Capability | Free | Pro | Team | Business |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Setupp Score on every booking | Included | Included | Included | Included |
| Turn a booker away automatically | Not included | Included | Included | Included |
| Your own scoring criteria | Not included | Included | Included | Included |
| Round robin assignment | Not included | Not included | Included | Included |
| A different form per event type | Not included | Not included | Included | Included |
| Meeting document per booking | Not included | Not included | Included | Included |
| Embed on your own site | Not included | Included | Included | Included |
| Outbound webhooks | Not included | Not included | Not included | Included |
| Hosts included | 1 | 3 | 10 | 50 |
| Per month, per workspace | Free | $19 | $49 | $129 |
Single sign-on, an audit log and a public API are on the roadmap and are deliberately absent from this table rather than listed and crossed out, because a row nobody enforces is a claim nobody checks.
Before you switch
The questions worth asking of any scheduler, including this one.
Is Setupp cheaper?
Above the crossover, yes. Below it, no, and the calculator on this page says so rather than rendering a zero. At the representative rate of $12 a seat the crossover is 5 hosts; at a lower rate it is higher, and at a low enough rate there isn't one. The gap widens as you add hosts WITHIN a plan and resets when you cross into the next one: at $12 a seat, ten hosts saves $71 a month and eleven saves $3, because the eleventh is the one that moves you to Business. Drag the calculator across a step and you can watch it happen.
Can I import my existing event types and booking links?
No. There is no importer, and no way to forward a link that lives on somebody else's domain. Rebuilding one event type takes about ten minutes; the honest advice is to move one, run both tools for a fortnight, and only then swap the link everywhere.
Does the qualification gate work on the free plan?
The score does, the gate does not. Free collects the intake answers and scores every booking 0 to 10, and it confirms all of them. Declining somebody automatically starts at Pro. That split is deliberate: it lets you see what the rules would have done for a fortnight before you let them do it.
Which calendars does it work with?
Google Calendar and Outlook are live, with Google Meet, Teams and Zoom for the meeting link. Apple Calendar over CalDAV is written and marked in development on the integrations page, because it has not yet run against a real iCloud account and this site only calls something live once it has.
What happens to bookings already on my calendar?
Nothing. Setupp reads your calendar for busy time and writes new events; it never touches anything it did not create. Both tools can run side by side for as long as you want, which is what makes a two week overlap the sensible way to move.
Does Setupp route leads to an account owner?
No. It assigns hosts two ways: collective, where every host is on the invite and availability is intersected across all of their calendars, and round robin, where one host is picked per booking and balanced across the team. Neither reads a CRM. If ownership routing is what you need, that is a genuine gap.
Can it hand off from a form on my own site?
Partly. The embed renders the whole booking flow, intake questions included, inline in your own page and inherits your design tokens, so a visitor never leaves. What it does not do is accept a submission from your existing form builder and continue from there.
Do we find out who was turned away?
You find out which question turned them away and how many, and nothing about the person. The declines table stores a rule and a field key and no identity, deliberately, so a form somebody filled in and failed does not become a record of them. A declined booker who leaves an address on the waitlist screen is the exception, because they chose to.
Are you affiliated with Chili Piper?
No. Setupp is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by Chili Piper, Inc., and Chili Piper is their trademark. This page states no prices or features on their behalf, which is why the calculator asks you for yours.
Stop taking calls you would have declined.
Connect a calendar, write the five questions you already ask on every call, and set the floor you already have in your head. About twenty minutes. Then never spend another Tuesday afternoon finding out about a mismatch.
One host free, forever. No card, no sales call to get a trial.
- 01Multi-recipient invitesfrom Pro
- 02Qualification before the calendarfrom Pro
- 03A score on every booking
- 04An embed that inherits your brandfrom Pro